PUBG Xbox Game Preview Patch Notes #9


Xbox Game Preview Patch Notes #9

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 03:07 AM PST

A visual representation of the Pubg anti-cheat system.

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 10:17 AM PST

I got this from Amazon

Posted: 01 Mar 2018 09:17 PM PST

Seriously what is the point of the red zone? Why not remove this feature Bluehole just like on tournaments?

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 05:48 AM PST

We know its completely random and It actually slows down the pace of the game because people have to go take cover inside houses and last but certainly not least, the red zone completely destroys our ear health, I always mute the sound whenever I can with the redzone, that stuff can potentially make you deaf with overuse.

submitted by /u/MaestroLA
[link] [comments]

Deadly Stowaway

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 03:07 AM PST

Those PUBG Feels....

Posted: 01 Mar 2018 09:19 PM PST

I changed my character skin colour and apparently I look like this to everybody.

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 08:04 AM PST

This legend on my college campus

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 11:04 AM PST

How about the playzone lining up with a fence?

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 09:23 AM PST

when you see 2 people teaming in solos

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 04:00 AM PST

We met an "AFK Chicken dinner cheat" today, I recorded his last action before magically disappeared in the map

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 03:49 AM PST

I learned how to pan today.

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 07:16 AM PST

Default fire mode should be full auto on SMGs

Posted: 01 Mar 2018 11:27 AM PST

Nothing more to say, I don't know why it's not already that way.

EDIT: The fact that this post has so many upvotes shows this is not an insignificant issue.

A couple of answer to reaction we got here:

  • I am ALL for an option to chose the default fire mode in the option menu. More flexibility is always better.

  • "It's only one press of a button" - Designers will all tell you that the less input you need to achieve something, the better (when that something doesn't create the game experience, or hinders it oc). Yes it's one input, but that's already too much. Imagine the default movement speed is walking, and you have to hold to jogg and double tap to sprint...

  • "Real weapons do not work like that" - Game design is lightyears away from real life, we're not even talking about a simulation game here, no point in refering to real life. Video games have tought us that guns go "brrrrrt" when they can. It's not realistic in so many ways, but still, when we pick up an UZI in GTA, we don't expect it to shoot single fire, same goes for Fallout, Crysis, MoH, Dirty Bomb, CoD, Battlefield and so many shooter (not sims, real shooter)

  • The fact that so many team player have to constantly remind each others to "switch to full auto" reallyyyy make it clear that it is not a instinctive behaviour, and that it is easy to forget to go full auto on many weapons.

  • git gud is not an argument.

submitted by /u/Jbn0s0rus
[link] [comments]

AFK Chickens - A new level of cheating

Posted: 01 Mar 2018 11:47 PM PST

WTFMoses goes nuts with the M24

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 08:57 AM PST

There shouldn't be a a clear winner in each weapon categories

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 03:15 AM PST

Weapons should be balanced so people use different weapons depending on there playstyles not a meta

Smgs, shotguns and pistols are balanced but when it comes to Assault rifles....

U have the akm that's hot trash most of the time and barely uses attachments

And u have the m416 that acts very damn good and downright God tier with attachments

That's better than smg, dmrs and other Ars

What i propose is that the akm gets a grip attachment or the m4 gets treated like the vector

That only shines when decked out Crate weapons should only be the clear winners but the m4 makes the aug looks bad

submitted by /u/Nomad2145
[link] [comments]

Honk if you spot me ��

Posted: 01 Mar 2018 12:58 PM PST

PUBG admits falsely banning innocent players, and they don't seem to care

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 12:41 AM PST

DISCLAIMER: THIS POST IS NOT FOR APPEALING YOUR BAN, THAT IS TO BE DONE VIA OFFICIAL CHANNELS AT https://pubgsupport.zendesk.com/ -- NO, THE MODS DIDN'T MAKE ME PUT THIS HERE, I'M JUST SHOWING A LITTLE GOOD FAITH AFTER THEY REINSTATED MY THREAD. IF YOU WERE FALSELY BANNED AND WISH TO POST SPECIFIC DETAILS, FEEL FREE TO VISIT /r/falselybannedfrompubg AND FOLLOW THE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES THERE.

Admission #1: https://twitter.com/poopieQueen/status/966303726607646720

Team Liquid player Jeemzz was banned from PUBG briefly last month. When the controversy spilled onto Twitter, everyone assumed it was from mass user reports against the pro player. Sammie Kang (@poopieQueen), lead community manager for PUBG, said it wasn't user reports but one of their "new [anti-cheat] measures" gone awry. She said that it would be fixed soon -- and Jeemzz was unbanned -- but apparently, the false bans are still happening.

Admission #2 is much more recent, and comes from the same person: https://twitter.com/gas_junky/status/968718376888565761

This time in response to my own outraged tweet because, surprise, I woke up the morning of February 26th and logged into Steam to find an account alert that I've been permabanned from PUBG by the developers without explanation. I assume it must be for cheating or something along those lines, but I don't know because no one has told me. My 4-day old ban appeal (going on 5 days as of this posting) is still sitting open and unanswered in the PUBG ZenDesk. But this isn't about me or my ban complaint. I just wanted to state that upfront in the interest of full disclosure. I'm not here to prove my innocence, I know I'm innocent.

The problem that I'm trying to bring attention to is the fact that I'm not alone. A lot of players are slipping through the cracks and getting flagged for the wrong reasons. It's all over Steam discussions, and it would be all over the official PUBG forums if they didn't delete threads that try to talk about it. For some, the appeal system works, but others are left waiting for a long time without any response or acknowledgment. Many choose to just make a new Steam account and buy the game again, which is their prerogative, but in my personal opinion, I say fuck that. I've had 1 Steam account for the past 11 years -- since I was 18-years-old -- with no VAC or game bans on record until this nonsense, and I have 1 PUBG account and it's going to stay that way. Besides, I'm not going to risk spending money on the game, rewarding the developers for bad practices, just for the same shit to potentially happen again.

I get that cheating is probably the #1 complaint with the community right now. And it has been such a problem it has stunted the core development of the game according to what I've read in PC Gamer. This is unfortunate, and I want to see cheaters banned as much as the next guy, but when you're shutting out honest players in an overzealous attempt to curb an issue that has, perhaps, been blown out of proportion, then there is something wrong with your cheat detection methods. Moreover, you're screwing over your support team by inundating them with false ban reports that have to be investigated and cleared -- assuming they ever get around to them -- which is taking time away from other legitimate support requests.

I'm not a developer, I have no idea what goes into creating and managing a game like this. I don't think I know the dev's jobs better than they do, and I'm not really mad at them. They are trying to do the best they can with the best ideas they have. I am compassionate and supportive of their efforts until their efforts cross a line and create bad faith within the community. I'm not a pro player from Team Liquid, I don't have a Twitch stream with a significant following, I'm a mediocre-to-average "meh" player who just wants to play with his friends and have a good time hunting chicken dinners. But this is kind of the problem here: All of us who have been falsely banned, whether our appeals worked or not, are a drop in the bucket to them. We're a tinny voice against the sea of money that's flowing through PUBG Corp and Bluehole, but our money matters just as much as the next player's and in the end it feels like we are the ones who have been cheated and forgotten. It's not fair, and I feel if there isn't more outrage about this then nothing is ever going to change. This is outrageous and it needs to stop.

submitted by /u/cog_
[link] [comments]

Could we get "Bipods" as an attachment for snipers or even ARs? Is that even a possibility?

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 09:43 AM PST

I would say that it could use the Angled/Vertical grip slot.

Atleast let us attach bipods on the bolt-action rifles please!

submitted by /u/EdvinHQ
[link] [comments]

Narnia Door bugged

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 07:25 AM PST

Epic 1 vs 3 surviving with 0 health

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 01:39 AM PST

Add own kills to kill feed.

Posted: 02 Mar 2018 11:13 AM PST

Why don't my own kills show up on my kill feed? Yeah I know its dead center of my screen, but when you get a multikill really fast its barely any different from kill to kill. Since I'm already looking top right for kills, I should be able to see my own.

submitted by /u/waymonster
[link] [comments]

So it's March 1st. Whens the road-map gonna release?

Posted: 01 Mar 2018 02:54 PM PST

I think im speaking for a lot of people here, but when the hell are we going to start getting updates again? There hasn't been a meaningful patch in weeks, no new content, and unfixed bugs still plague. Now that the hackers seem to be subsiding via the ping patch last week, can we finally start discussing upcoming content. But before we can do that, BLUEBALLS we need the road-map.

Edit: Wow these fanboys a rabid today. Keep down-voting meaningful discussion. Post more of your favorite e-celebs then.

submitted by /u/SilentDerek
[link] [comments]

Mini 14 is a joke

Posted: 01 Mar 2018 08:04 PM PST

I seriously hate the mini now. I put 5 shots into a guy with a level one vest and he didn't go down. It's a sniper not a rifle... I only used it because I had a suppressor, but still it's a sniper rifle not a tickle machine. Can it get some love?

Edit: it seems I got my terms wrong. It's a marksman rifle meaning it's more of a rifle with sniper attachments. I understand that now, but the gun is a joke compared to when it first came out. It was OP when it came out, but now it's not as viable as it used to be. Close range it's decent, but long range when it takes 4-5 shots to down someone is not good at all.

submitted by /u/mythrilguy
[link] [comments]

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.